Google sent me a notice that one of my blog posts violated copyright laws in a specific country. No country was identified.
The offending post is titled "Epstein's Junkermann PEU." I posted it in February 2026.
The piece dealt with the Epstein files and the child sex predator's relationship with Nicole Junkermann, a European private equity underwriter (PEU).
The communication stated an offending URL but provided none below that line:
Affected URL(s):
-----------------
A review of the post showed no remaining links. The communication included the name of the person filing the complaint against PEU Report.
I searched for a reporter, author or writer by that name and found none. A photographer had a similar name but differed in the spelling of their first name. I did find a trainee solicitor with that name at a London law firm.
I wondered if an image was the source of the problem as I used a photo from a Business Magazine (UK) article and added images of Jeffrey Epstein, NJF Capital and NJF Private Equity.
I also included a graphic with an e-mail communication between Nicole Junkerman and Jeffrey Epstein. This e-mail was at one time included in the DOJ's Epstein files release, which is how I obtained it.
The content of the post is below (all my words):
(introductory image - compliation as described above)
The Epstein Library has curious functionality. Yesterday I could search the last name Junkermann and see 4,000 results. Today it shows zero.
A search on that person's first name, Nicole, produced over 5,000 results. I'll venture most belong to Junkermann but there is another Nicole that works for Deutsche Bank.
Nicole Junkermann founded NJF Capital which invests in various transformative tech ventures. It also has a sister firm, NJF Private Equity. That makes her a private equity underwriter (PEU). There aren't many who can pull off a TechGod/PEU combo.
In January 2014 TechGoddess Nicole Junkermann informed Jeffrey Epstein that she had "split up with mario."
Junkermann experienced the creep in Jeffrey Epstein. He lorded over her as ungrateful and ungiving, but she gave it right back.
(image of their communication)
Jeffrey and his wingman, Donald, missed the part about insiders not speaking badly about other insiders. Either would trash you in a heartbeat.
The DOJ's Epstein Library is another window into politicians Red & Blue love PEU and their new TechGod brethren where increasingly, more are one.
Google informed me that I could appeal the decision. I began the "counter notice" form but was quickly stymied as it required a reference number and none was provided in the e-mail.
I deleted the introductory photo, which is the only thing that included copyright material. The post remained hidden from public view.
Google has enabled me to share my thoughts on multiple blogs over the years and for that I am grateful. But I must say their technology enabled, non-customer service is unparalleled in its complexity and near undecipherability.
One can see how little information Google shared with me (light yellow boxes) relative to what they provide to Lumen.
I have no idea how to inform Google that I removed the offending picture which included a portion of copyrighted material (potentially considered fair use).
Why would Google or a London law firm be interested in my post on Jeffrey Epstein and Nicole Junkermann? I have not a clue.
Politicians Red & Blue love PEU and their new TechGod brethren. Increasingly, more are one and the globe rotates around their axis, maximizing their status, enrichment and pleasure.