I admit it. I missed the major thrust of The Carlyle Group's byzantine "cash tax savings" in their "tax receivable agreement.". I mistakenly thought Carlyle's co-founders were being indemnified against any future tax increases on carried interest. Instead, it's a co-founder cash bleeding of affiliates
We will enter into a tax receivable agreement
with our existing owners whereby the corporate taxpayers (affiliates) will
agree to pay to our existing owners (partners) 85% of the amount of cash
tax savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax
that they realize as a result of these increases in tax basis.
This bizarre siphoning of cash from affiliates is based on the pass through of corporate overhead from Carlyle. Pre-IPO Carlyle's owners estimated this cash sluice to be over $1 billion. Removing the jargon from Carlyle's final S-1/A we get:
Based upon certain assumptions, we
estimate that the corporate taxpayers
aggregate amount (owed) would be
approximately $1,035.6 million.
Post $22 per share IPO, Carlyle's
latest filing has this down over $120 million::
Based
upon certain assumptions, we
estimate that the corporate taxpayers
aggregate amount (owed) would be
approximately $915.2 million.
Driving home the cash drain intent is Carlyle's description of its Tax Receivable Agreement:
Payments under the tax receivable agreement will be based on the
tax reporting positions that we will determine. The corporate
taxpayers will not be reimbursed for any payments previously
made under the tax receivable agreement if a tax basis increase
is successfully challenged by the IRS.
As a result, in certain circumstances, payments could be made
under the tax receivable agreement in excess of the corporate
taxpayers’ cash tax savings.
In the event that The Carlyle Group L.P. or any of its
wholly-owned subsidiaries become taxable as a corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, these entities will also
be obligated to make payments under the tax receivable agreement
on the same basis and to the same extent as the corporate
taxpayers.
It remains to be seen how that odd "qui pro quo" at the end materializes. The end result is a cash bypass of new Carlyle stock holders. These payments are made to exiting owners, not unit holders.
How many new Carlyle investors are aware of this? I envision them standing and staring at their unit.
Update 5-7-12: Forbes speaks of the potential conflict between PEU partners and unit/stock holders.
Update 8-3-15: Naked Capitalism noted this PEU trick to strip cash from affiliates going public.
Update 8-4-22: A pension fund sued Carlyle Group Inc.'s
senior leaders in Delaware, challenging a $344 million payment to the
private equity firm’s founders in connection with the end of tax
agreements they reached when taking the asset manager public.
Update 8-15-24: A large pension fund sued KKR over its tax receivable agreement with founders Henry Kravis and George Roberts.